ON SOCIALIZATION
It is the one thing Hannah and I are most asked, when we even mention the possibility we will home educate Twyla (though it is a pretty good probability at this point).
In truth, it is something we thought about, and were concerned about, until we actually looked into the matter. So I understand why people ask, "but what about socialization public school provides?" (Or private, for that matter.) But that doesn't make it any less tiring. One solution would be to not mention that we plan to home educate. But I don't like doing that because I actually think talking about it is my way of trying to disembed the "faith in public education" that is essentially a religion of so many.
In any event, here's a good perspective on "the socialization question", from the fantastic Well-Trained Mind, the book that functions as a primary guide through understanding the value of classical education. It is a long excerpt, but this is an important topic. Not only to understand why I think the premise of the question is misguided, but because, simply, so many people bring it up.The most convicing proof that home-educated children develop normally is a conversation with a home-educated child who's bright, engaged, polite, interesting, and outgoing. Home-school graduates get into college and do fine; they get jobs and excel.
But it's important to understand what socialization means. According to the dictionary, socialization is "the process by which a human being, beginning in infancy, acquires the habits, beliefs, and accumulated knowledge of his society." In other words, you're being socialized when you learn habits, acquire beliefs, learn about the society around you, develop character traits, and become competent in ths skills you need to function properly in society.
Who teaches all of this? Agents of socialization include the family (both immediate and extended), the religious community, neighborhoods, tutors and mentors, the media (TV, radio, films, books, magazines all tell the child what's expected of him, for better or worse), clubs (social or academic), the arts (both in observation and participation), travel, jobs, civic participation. And formal schooling is an institution.
Taking the child out of school doesn't mean theat you're going to remove him from the other "agents of socialization" that surround him. Furthermore, think about the type of socialization that takes place in school. The child learns how to function in a specific environment, one where he's surrounded by thirty children his own age. This is a very specific type of socialization, one that may not prove particularly useful. When, during the course of his life, will he find himself in this kind of context? Not in work or in family life or in his hobbies. The classroom places the child in a peer-dominated situation that he'll probably not experience again.
And this type of socialization may be damaging. Thirty years ago, Cornell Professor of Child Development Urie Bronfenbrenner warned that the "socially-isolated, age-graded peer group" created a damaging dependency in which middle-school students relied on their classmates for approval, direction, and affection. He warned that if parents, other adults, and older children continued to be absent from the active daily life of younger children, we could expect "alienation, indifference, antogonism, and violence on the part of the younger generation." Not that any of that has happened in the last thirty years, or anything.Peer acceptance is dangerous. When a child is desperate to fit in to receive acceptance from those who surround him all day, every day he may defy your rules, go against his own conscience, or even break the law. Nor this, ever.We live in an age in which people think a great deal about their peers, talk about them constantly, and act as if a child's existence will be meaningless if he isn't accepted by his peer group. But the socialization that best prepares a child for the real world can't take place when a child is closed up in a classroom or always with his peer group. It happens when the child is living with people who vary widely in age, personality, background, and circumstance.
The antidote for peer-centered socialization is to make the family the basic unit for socialiation the center of the child's experience. The family should be the place where real things happen, where there is a true interest in each other, acceptance, patience, and peace, as far as it possible.
Socialization in the family starts when very young children learn that they can trust adults to give them answers, to read books to them, to talk to them, to listen to music with them.... (Note: please reference The Attachment Parenting Book : A Commonsense Guide to Understanding and Nurturing Your Baby for more on how to encourage trust of parents by children, starting from the first weeks of pregnancy. Highly recommended, from personal experience ... and thanks again, Victoria!)Socialization continues as the child learns to fit into the lives of his parents and siblings, to be considerate and thoughtful of other people, to be unselfish instead of self-centered. A two year old can learn to play along for a few minutes while the parent teachers a ten year old; an eight year old can learn not to practice the piano during the baby's nap time. It's the real world when a child learns to play quietly because Daddy is working on his income taxes....
In our society, children, taught by their peer gropus, learn to survive, not to live with kindness and grace. Exclusive peer groups cliques start forming around age five. Even in kindergarten, children are accepted or rejected on the basis of what they wear, what toys they own, what TV programs they watch. Even when adults are supervising, these cliques survive and strengthen as children grow. And only the strongest flourish. Geez, not familiar, at all. Nope.The trend in our culture is to devalue even bypass the family as a basic unit of socialization. But it's within the family that children learn to love by seeing love demonstrated; learn unselfishness both through teaching and through example (choosing to teach a child at home is unselfishness at work); learn conflict resolution by figuring out how to get along with parents and with each other.
The family unit the basic agent of socialization is itself a place to communicate with people of different ages. But socialization doesn't stop there. As a family, you should make a wide range of friends of various ages. Home-school parent and lawyer Christopher Klicka points out that home-educated children are continually socialized through community activities, Little League, Scouts, band, music lessons, art classes, field trips, and the numerous events sponsored by local home-school support groups. There's more (this is from chapter 36), but this is enough for now. So, to recap, the premise that lack of formal school (via public/government/socialized school, or via private school) necessarily means diminished socialization is misguided, narrow thinking. The main assertion is that the family ought be the primary "agent of socialization". Is this something people dispute?
Well, if you do dispute it, you ought know what "in loco parentis" is (see here, if you don't), and that formal schools cite this for means of asserting their own importance. The ironic thing is that this doctrine (Latin for "in the place of the parent") compells one to come to the conclusion that, ultimately, the family is the primal importance in education is something largely acknowledged (if veiled in our current age). Even the formal schools advocates know, in their hears, that this is true, not to mention the U.S. Supreme Court.
Thus what is needed, at the root, is courageous parents. Willing to follow what deep down they feel (I would argue, are programmed by virtue of human nature) is right namely that they, and no one else, ought be the primary educators of their children. And, naturally, that Family Is Number 1.
12:21 PM |
Permanent Link
| Email This!
0 comments
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
|